“Our marks of piety can actually be evidence of our impiety.”
Disappointing for a supposed classic of theology. Expected better from R. C. Sproul. An important topic for Christians. Even given Sproul’s well-known Calvinist orientation, his writings betray poor scholarship and bias. Good discussion of meanings of original texts, such as the same word being translated as truly and pray.
“The justice of God is always and ever an expression of His holy character.”
His theological gaffs are funny. He reports Romans 8 “renew the mind” means “nothing more and nothing less than education.” He tells us “we are called to strive with all our might to produce this fruit [of the Spirit].” Strive? He reports to “make decision” to be born again is a “delusion.”
“Don’t ever ask God for justice–you might get it.”
The above errors can be excused as partisan politics (yes, theologians do it), but his attempt to discredit Arminian theology by labeling it semi-Pelagian is disingenuous. Masking the Arminian versus Calvinist dichotomy under different labels does nothing for Sproul’s credibility.
“If man is not made for God, why is he only happy in God? If man is made for God, why is he so opposed to God?” Blaise Pascal
Despite all that this text has many good thoughts and arguments.
“Almost every natural man that hears of hell, flatters himself that he will escape it.” Jonathan Edwards