The DoD as Duct Tape

Public Domain (Cecil Stoughton, White House)

“Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty,” John Kennedy said over fifty years ago.

He was wrong.

We tried; we couldn’t. We don’t really want to.

Diplomacy? Send a Navy carrier group. Natural disaster? Send in the Air Force. Policing hostile countries? Send in the Army. Anomalous threats to world peace? Send in the Marines. Bad guy on the loose? Send a drones.

Vietnam, Colombia, South China Sea, Indonesia, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria. Ebola in Liberia?

Often without a declaration of war. Sometimes without Congressional acquiescence. Occasionally without a plan.

And often it worked. But every time we used fighting forces for humanitarian or peacekeeping functions, we dulled their edge as a fighting force. We also blurred, in our own minds as well as the rest of the world, the line between defending and meddling.

We can and should use our defense forces to help others. But there is a cost higher than mission creep, budget busting and the inner confusion of the soldier facing angry folks with a weapon he’s not allowed to use.

The greater danger is that the US Department of Defense becomes the duct tape of the world. We apply them indiscriminately every problem. We forget that force, even military logistics or intelligence gathering, is not necessarily the correct solution to all problems.

Every child in a school yard full of bullies knows you have to pick your fights. And know when not to fight.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The DoD as Duct Tape

  1. Absolutely! Well put.
    When we went to Iraq for the second time, I immediately thought about Vietnam and thought “oh no. We’ll be stuck there for years, like Vietnam. Lots of young, brave people will die and be maimed, for oil?” With this latest venture, I’m sure the general and former Secty of Defense are right. We’ll end up with “boots on the ground” once again. We won’t be able to defeat ISIS without our troops. But at what cost?
    I’m focused on West Africa and the exponential growth of the epidemic. If they can’t get a handle on the spread, the figure I read yesterday was 55,000 infected within the next month! A threat of another kind. Sometimes the world turmoil feels overwhelming. No wonder I’m writing a post-apocalyptic novel. I’ve read several post-apocalyptics, recently published and not the old time science fiction outer space ones with lurid covers, but main stream stories with plausible causes.
    Sorry this post is so long! You struck a nerve.

  2. But it is a thoughtful response. Rather than respond here I’ll make a new post.

    I, too, am concerned about Ebola. “It can’t happen here” are among the most fatal last words in any language. And we–the entire world–are too modern to return easily to the self-supporting farms which were the norm for millennia.

Comments are closed.